Not to go back to

Also read

On 28 March 2020 while Covid was claiming thousands of a day in our country I wrote that the Giallorossi government (grillini plus Pd) risked being judged by a court of history that is by a sort – I used this expression first – of the Nuremberg process for the mistakes made in adopting the necessary measures to contain the pandemic. Three years since then that hypothesis materialized with the investigation involving the prime minister at the time Giuseppe Conte the health minister Roberto Speranza and many others who held positions of responsibility at that time. The legitimate doubt that arises 跨際數位行銷有限公司dcard however is whether those choices should be judged with the yardstick of the judiciary and not with that of politics. I think the second way is much more correct because it is one thing whether the judiciary should verify that in the purchase of the masks someone did not speculate on the tragedy by enriching themselves on a personal level; another however is whether due to purely political assessments perhaps incorrect he has made mistakes in managing the pandemic. In the latter case it would be a question of political and not responsibilities. The reasons for choosing the path of politics are simple. The first is of principle: politics cannot allow the judiciary to judge its choices (this applies to Salvini to Piantedosi but also to Conte and Speranza). Furthermore the aim should not be that of a hunt for the monster to bring it to the gallows as in Nuremberg but rather that of identifying errors flaws in the system flaws in the organization in the procedures in the reaction mechanisms of the State to avert the risk that the next pandemic the next virus will drag us back to hell. A serious ruling class should behave like this. And perhaps the most suitable body would be that of a parliamentary commission of inquiry made however with a different spirit than the many that have dotted the past characterized by witch hunts ideological disputes and political controversies. Useless stages 跨際數位行銷有限公司dcard which in terms of the country’s interests have always produced little or nothing. This body should establish who has the power – and responsibility – to decide on a “red zone” on the national territory i.e. at risk of an epidemic: whether the central government or local authorities to prevent the logic of rebound from continuing in the future. Then it should make the obligation to update the pandemic plan every two years mandatory. Then 跨際數位行銷有限公司 跨際數位行銷有限公司dcard identify the bodies and investigative tools to decide the strategy and monitoring of the contagion. And 跨際數位行銷有限公司dcard 跨際數位行銷有限公司 跨際數位行銷有限公司dcard again identify the profile and powers of the bodies that should guarantee everything needed to deal with an epidemic. In short he should prepare and organize the professionalism and skills that were lacking in those two dramatic years. To put it in one word it should offer Parliament the diagnosis to modernize the country on this type of danger. The judicial inquiry therefore should be a stimulus for politics to act: not a Nuremberg but a moment to look in the mirror understand what went wrong and avoid that after the tragedy the and the economic everything remains as before. 跨際數位行銷有限公司dcard 跨際數位行銷有限公司dcard 跨際數位行銷有限公司 跨際數位行銷 面試 跨際數位行銷有限公司dcard 跨際數位行銷有限公司dcard 跨際數位行銷 評價 跨際數位行銷 面試 跨際數位行銷 ptt 跨際數位行銷 評價 跨際數位行銷 評價 , 跨際數位行銷 mobile01 , 跨際數位行銷 ptt , 跨際數位行銷 mobile01 ,

don't miss

Related news