Two first sentences deny the return of fines in the Plaza Elíptica

Also read

Two sentences corresponding to the same citizen but to different files have overthrown the appellant’s intention to dismiss the fines imposed on him in the low-emission zone of Plaza Elíptica. These are the first two rulings in which a driver has not been able to get his money back (100 for each fine since he promptly paid the original amount which is double). The rulings to which ABC has had access are from two different courts and thus end with the resolutions in favor of other motorists who were penalized until May but who complained 跨際數位行銷 跨際數位行銷 fundamentally because the municipal signage was deficient until it was corrected. The first of the sentences more detailed in detail 跨際數位行銷有限公司 跨際數位行銷 跨際數位行銷有限公司 跨際數位行銷有限公司dcard 跨際數位行銷 responds to the following claims by the appellant: breach of the principle of trust derived from the lack of transparent information to the citizen in the ordinance that restricts the passage through the Plaza Elíptica to cars due to the anti-pollution plan; the “poor signage” of the low emission zone “; the “collection effort of the Administration for the uncontrolled imposition of sanctions in the matter of pollution”; and the “nullity of the administrative act” when the driver considers that this stretch of road is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and not of the city council. All these elements are discarded by the judge taking into account 跨際數位行銷 in the first case that the notice period lasted two months 跨際數位行銷 跨際數位行銷有限公司 跨際數位行銷 面試 跨際數位行銷 評價 跨際數位行銷有限公司dcard 跨際數位行銷 and that the offense was committed on “May 5 2022” when the radars were already in operation. . One by one the Contentious-Administrative Court rejects the appeal. In the second ruling on a fine of February 2 2022 the other magistrate endorses the procedure of the city council and denies that it is as the appellant argues a continuous infringement (for this to be the case there should be a first sanction of executive character). The “lack of competence that the plaintiff alleges” is also the subject of debate: the law stipulates that “the competences in the environment and pollution” are municipal. 跨際數位行銷 面試 跨際數位行銷有限公司dcard 跨際數位行銷有限公司 跨際數位行銷 跨際數位行銷 面試 跨際數位行銷 ptt , 跨際數位行銷 mobile01 , 跨際數位行銷 評價 跨際數位行銷 ptt , 跨際數位行銷 mobile01 , 跨際數位行銷 評價

don't miss

Related news